CloudCompare forum

-Remove_SF command also overwrites source file. Not sure if this is intended behaviour, but there is some data loss risk as it behaves different from the most common behaviour that is to create a new file with the commands used in the name.

awesome catch! I'll check that out. !!

ok

Hi, So, I was trying again to train a classifier and left it overnight for in the morning to find a somewhat meh ressult. So I was checking the computed feature scalar fields when I noticed the looked quite different from the onces I did compute manually in order to guess the correct scale for the c...

This is still the case in the current stable version.

https://youtu.be/0ByHjieQcS4 The track is MMS scan from Virtual Shizuoka Dataset. BKG is Aerial Scan. Processing the data was hell, but managed to build a somewhat reasonable workflow yet mesh retopology and cloud segmentation remain the main challenges. I'll add references to CC in credits or launc...

thanks for the explanation!.

Yeah sure, totally understand that not mainstream features not to be implemented.

But when I create an octree with Edit>Octree>Compute In the DBtree when I set to visualize the octree, the lowest values are the sparse ones and as octree goes up there are more points, should then octree 1 be the simplest way to compute distances? It is wild that the preview can´t be baked as an SF...

this happens with user interface. When I save as .las. For example, if you compute PCV. When you save the file, on the "extra escalar fields" tab PCV does not show up automatically. In the past this was seamless with a checkbox, which was automatically enabled. I don´t mind the new UI, it ...

I just faced this again and this issue is still live, for example if I compute PCV this is not saved automatically.