It can happen if all the points are at the exact same position (it may be the case in the file, or it's maybe because there's a reading error).
Can you send me the file maybe? (admin [at] cloudcompare.org)
Search found 7362 matches
- Mon Apr 08, 2019 7:38 pm
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: georeferenced pointclouds
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1423
- Mon Apr 08, 2019 7:25 pm
- Forum: Requests, new functionalities
- Topic: Coordinates are too big - issue
- Replies: 5
- Views: 16477
Re: Coordinates are too big - issue
Don't you use the 'Yes to all' button? Because in this case it only stops when it encounters large coordinates that cannot be 'fixed' with the previous Global shift values.
Or did I missed something?
Or did I missed something?
- Sun Apr 07, 2019 8:10 am
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Rasterize Scalar Fields
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2441
Re: Rasterize Scalar Fields
Ok, this was definitely a bug. The 'interpolate SF(s)' check-box was automatically disabled when a SF was selected as 'layer' (so as to 'force' the user to select a projection strategy). But the fact that it was disabled was considered as a reason for not computing the scalar field! That's fixed in ...
- Sun Apr 07, 2019 8:09 am
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Cant Open OBJ file
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2632
Re: Can Open OBJ file
Maybe because the file IS malformed? :p
Can you share it with us? (admin [at] cloudcompare.org)
Can you share it with us? (admin [at] cloudcompare.org)
- Sat Apr 06, 2019 6:54 pm
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Rasterize Scalar Fields
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2441
Re: Rasterize Scalar Fields
Did you manage to find a reproducible way to 'achieve' this bug? (step by step)
- Sat Apr 06, 2019 9:36 am
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Differences in height for 2 point clouds from laser scanner
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2415
Re: Differences in height for 2 point clouds from laser scanner
Using a single number doesn't make sense when you have many points and distance values. The best you can say is exactly what appears at the top of the histogram: 0.003 average and 0.045 standard deviation (unless you have an excellent accuracy, I wouldn't use more digits - with 3 digits you''l get m...
- Fri Apr 05, 2019 7:09 pm
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Differences in height for 2 point clouds from laser scanner
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2415
Re: Differences in height for 2 point clouds from laser scanner
I don't understand what you are trying to do or obtain with this 'average' values. The difference of the height averages is not directly linked to the average of the M3C2 distances... The M3C2 distance is more complex (it has in itself a kind of local averaging effect to be more robust to noise, but...
- Fri Apr 05, 2019 6:09 pm
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Rasterize Scalar Fields
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2441
Re: Rasterize Scalar Fields
When you change the active layer, do you always press the 'Update grid' button?
- Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:12 pm
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Export points coordinates picked for 2 clouds alignment
- Replies: 2
- Views: 701
Re: Export points coordinates picked for 2 clouds alignment
Nope you can't export them currently (you would have to hack the code to do that). And I don't expect a big variability, as the ICP algorithm should more or less converge to the (almost) same position as long as the rough registration is not too bad. Mind also that with the default parameters of the...
- Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:09 pm
- Forum: Questions
- Topic: Differences in height for 2 point clouds from laser scanner
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2415
Re: Differences in height for 2 point clouds from laser scanner
So the average of the M3C2 will the difference in height which is around 0.003 mm? Sorry, I didn't understand your question. the thing which confuses me is the M3C2 contour maps showing a big difference but the number is small like 0.003 mm. What do you mean by "big difference" ? And if y...